ORMUS and Scalar Waves
by Larry Schamber
Date: Mon, 31 Dec 2001 02:23:14 -0500
Subject: How to make repeatable measurements
From: Larry
I just want to underline how little technical craft has seemingly been collected. It does seem to be a nagging
and therefore valid complaint. Suppose we address this reality? I am ready to speak about my technical insights
which distilled upon me last week just after I performed the grape juice/baking soda experiment. Perhaps proper to
solve this problem of measurement by the application thereof.
First the immediate issue of measurements. There are more states of a given ormus element to be discerned than
you perhaps might have imagined. I have a physics book (1): Figure 5 "An enlarged section of the nuclidic chart of
Fig. 4, centered on (197)Au."
Neutron
Number N
|
%natural
abundance
|
Half-life
|
| 194 Au |
0%
|
39.5 hours |
| 195 Au |
0%
|
183 days |
| 196 Au |
0%
|
6.18 days |
| 197 Au |
100%
|
stable |
| 198 Au |
0%
|
2.70 days |
| 199 Au |
0%
|
3.14 days |
| 200 Au |
0%
|
48.4 minutes |
|
|
|
| 193 Pt |
0%
|
50 yrs approx |
| 194 Pt |
32.9%
|
stable |
| 195 Pt |
33.8%
|
stable |
| 196 Pt |
25.3%
|
stable |
| 197 Pt |
0%
|
18.3 hr |
| 198 Pt |
7.2%
|
stable |
| 199 Pt |
0%
|
30.8 min |
These various nuclides represent only different numbers of neutrons.
What changes besides the spin state in the ormus? The number of neutrons in the nucleus. My fundamental key step
in learning is to realize that changes in mass angular momentum equate to transformations of scalar waves, or what
John Milewski calls superlight. Also neutrinos are one manifestation of scalar waves, which are an energy band
attuned to nuclear angular momentum interactions.
We understand from experiments and from David Hudson's analyses that the high spin state of the T-metal group
(heavy nuclei) elements permits nuclear transformations to occur at lower energies. That's a fact. He showed that
exposure to sunlight caused the ormus elements to "explode into light." Then the matter vanished. It actually
didn't move, it just shifted into an state which is invisible and 44.44% less influenced by gravity. Did he see
light? I don't think so. He saw charring of a pencil and other evidence that he inferred was caused by a
photoflash. Later he said perhaps they were gamma rays.
What I think happened was this: the interactions with sunlight caused a gradual injection of two sorts of
angular momentum into the nucleus. Both are increases in angular momentum. Angular momentum is equal to angular
mass moment * angular speed.
One sort results in increased nuclear angular speed, i.e. it spins faster or slower, but no change in mass. The
other sort changed the nuclear mass by the loss or capture of a neutron. What that really means is that a neutron
can be added into the nucleus when one passes through the nucleus under the right conditions. The neutron can also
probably tunnel from atom to atom, if they are in high spin states, through quantum coherence. But the key to this
is to grasp and hold tight to this simple fact:
A neutrino is angular momentum. A scalar wave is angular momentum. A neutrino is a scalar wave. They are in fact
identical!!!
So when scalar waves interact with anything, they transfer normally very small mounts of angular momentum, and a
great number of these small interactions cancel out the angular momentum and settles out as a transfer of pure
momentum; i.e., force. This is what we call the force of gravity.
Scalar waves come in all energies. The less the energy, the larger the wavelength. Remember that there is a
really tremendous number of neutrinos flowing through our bodies and through the earth and out the other side of
the earth without interacting or even slowing down. Neutrinos are technically very difficult to detect. High energy
neutrinos are small enough that they can completely enter the nucleus boundaries and if conditions are just right,
the nucleus can capture one. Too much energy and it's re-emitted. Too little energy and it passes through like a
ghost, with very little or no interaction, or maybe just a change in spin state without a neutrino
transformation.
Every time a nucleus changes in angular momentum, EVERY TIME, there must be an interaction with the scalar wave
field, which manifests as neutrinos in some instances. But in a broader and equally true way, when any object no
matter how large changes in angular momentum, there was interaction with the scalar wave field.
The ormus atoms are actually perfect little machines for transforming EM waves into scalar waves, and scalar
waves into EM waves.
There is apparently no brief way to reveal the whole grand sweep of this picture. Most of the time scalar waves
are deemed undetectable, because we don't realize that gravity is the sum of multiple scalar wave interactions.
Scalar waves can also be created very easily with simple RF wave interactions. Scalar waves can pass through matter
as easily, in fact more easily than 'neutrinos', because they are at a lower energy and a larger wavelength, so
that means a scalar wave will not lose a significant fraction of its total energy while passing through matter.
If ormus atoms are scalar/EM wave transformers, how does that help us? Suppose you know that your 'batch of Dead
Sea ORMUS' lost its high spin. Couldn't you just recharge it somehow? Maybe a pulsed magnetic field, if we could
prevent it from tunneling or becoming superfluid and escaping from the container. Maybe exposure to sunlight under
the right conditions. Even better it would be if the ormus that is in the body could be recharged too. Assuming
that we have a way of measuring ormus bulk spin state, this question could easily be answered. We'd just hook up
our ormus spin state meter, and slowly expose the ormus batch to the noonday sun, and see what happens to the bulk
spin rate.
When the ormus has lost its high spin, then it necessarily has lost its BSE electron pair. They are needed for
the ormus to function as perfect scalar/EM wave transformers. If the BSE electron pair has flown the coop, then the
tiny ormus angel has lost its wings, and cannot feed on light nor act as transporters of spiritual light (scalar
wave signals).
To regain its high spin state and thus be able to regain its BSE electron 'wings', I think it must be recharged
in a particular way, if it must conveniently remain in water. Fire recharging would work, but it might destroy the
molecular formula. It would be difficult. But I think that electric or magnetic field pulses or even both in some
combination could recharge it.
But I think this also can be worked out if the ormus spin state meter can be designed and built. In fact the
spin state meter probably could only detect bulk spin state, whether the exact same number of ormus atoms are
present, or they have only lost their spin charge.
I think I'll stop now, because it's better to tell the story in a series of small easy to read installments. I
have to think about this problem for some way to resolve it. There must be some known way in which ormus changes
the properties of water or salt water solutions.
(1)Fundamentals of Physics, 3rd Extended Edition, Halliday & Resnick, pub. Wiley, 1988, page 1080
Pt 2 How to make repeatable measurements
Date: Mon, 31 Dec 2001 15:33:24 -0500
Subject: How to make repeatable measurements
Part 2: Ormus and scalar waves, the mechanism of translation to and from EM waves
From: Larry Schamber
email: Larry_Schamber@hotmail.com
I hope you are all excited and pleasantly anticipating the explanation of how ormus and scalar waves and a great
deal of others mysteries are interconnected and understood. I think this is an eminently proper topic for the WPG
list.
I wanted to toss in one more possible interesting connection: the merkaba chariot of light, which enables
space/time spiritual transport. I think it will be possible to clarify it in this chapter.
Those of you who have a great deal of drive to explore this topic as I did earlier will want to study or at
least scan the following sites:
John Milewski's superlight site:
http://www.luminet.net/~wenonah/new/milewski.htm
You might find Tom Bearden's Scalar wave website useful, but you have to push through the weeds to pluck a few
imperfect daisies. If you want to pluck the daisies see this website:
http://www.cheniere.org/toc.html
This is technical and correct mathematical treatment of scalar waves, the speed of gravity, ZPE, antigravity,...
Hal Puthoff's writings, and others:
http://earthtech.org/publications/
Part 2: Ormus and scalar waves, the mechanism of translation to and from EM waves
On John Milewski's superlight site he makes this statement which I found very intriguing:
***begin quote***
Now, I believe a similar event occurs in the extremely dense and hot matter found in black holes. It is theorized
that black holes contain magnetic monopoles and when these extremely dense, extremely small, extremely energetic
magnetic monopoles release energy by lowering their orbit they radiate magnetoelectric radiation, our SuperLight.
So black holes really are not so black. They are radiant beings of SuperLight. Of course SuperLight escapes the
strong gravitation forces of the black holes because its velocity is the square of the velocity of light and it
therefore, can easily escape.
***end quote***
This was actually the last key which when I understood it, the whole scalar wave picture fell into place.
When I was a student taking physics classes, we theorized about the existence of magnetic monopoles, which would
fulfill symmetry with electrons and positrons (electric charge monopoles) and neutrinos and antineutrinos (mass
monopoles). Sadly, we were told that no one had yet discovered the actual existence of magnetic monopoles. Yet, I
have continued to hope for their discovery which would satisfy my desire for symmetry.
Then after reading and pondering the previous quote, a thought occurred to me: 'what if there was a way to
exactly simulate the resulting action as if a magnetic monopole was in a circular orbit?'
So coming up is the physical mechanism which would simulating a moving magnetic monopole.
But first a little explanation. A magnetic field can be mathematically modeled as a pair of two distinct points:
a magnetic flux source and a magnetic flux sink. Think of magnetic flux as similar to water or any fluid. Imagine a
pool of water and in the pool is a pipe at the surface so that when the water level is higher than the pipe, water
flows into the pipe. That's like a magnetic flux sink. If the flow rate is to remain constant, there must be a
water flowing from somewhere into the pool, perhaps from another pipe with a diffuser disk on top of it which makes
the water flow out evenly in all directions. That's like a magnetic flux sink. Every magnetic field that we know
really exists has a pair of exactly matching magnetic flux points, one positive flux, and one for negative
flux.
Even an electromagnet which is made with a coil of wire with electric current flowing through it acts exactly so
as to conserve the magnetic flux.
So that we can replicate the effect of a circulating magnetic monopole, simply imagine a permanent magnet as a
rod containing a flux source and sink at it's ends. If the south pole is fixed in space, but the north pole is made
to rotate in a circle, then you have made one moving magnetic monopole!
If it rotates in a perfectly constant speed in a perfect circle, then the magnetic monopole is also under a
constant acceleration. The magnitude of the acceleration is constant, but the acceleration vector is rotating about
the center of rotation. In a mathematically correct way, we say the acceleration vector is rotating at a constant
speed, and has a constant magnitude of acceleration. The scalar component of acceleration is constant.
An easy way to visualize this is to imagine a cone with its point downward, and it's circular base turned
upward. The south pole of the magnet is at the point, while the north pole is tracing the circular perimeter of the
cone. This is exactly as if a magnetic monopole was created and made to move in a circular path at a constant
speed.
Behold: the discovery of the virtual magnetic monopole! But, sad to say, Tesla was prior to me, and many others
no doubt.
Now consider the Philadelphia experiment. Just be mindful of it.
Scalar waves are emitted or created whenever the magnetic monopole's angular speed (the scalar component of the
acceleration vector) is changed. That is the same as if the speed of the rotating magnet changed.
Further, to make scalar waves, you don't need a physical bar magnet. The same thing can be done if you use a
properly structured set of coils and signal generators. That is what Tesla did at the Philadelphia experiment. He
had these three cone shaped coils and a three phase signal generator, which worked together to make a virtual
magnetic monopole circulate like the moving magnet in the previous example. When the field was pulsed, scalar waves
were produced.
So this relates to ormus and all matter as follows. Ormus atoms are like other atoms in that they contain
neutrons and protons. When the atom in a high spin state elongates like an egg or a football, the positive charges
must rearrange to be as far apart from each other as possible. So some are equally concentrated at each end of the
egg. It spins in the same way as if you placed an egg on a flat surface and spin it. The natural spin axis is
perpendicular to the flat surface, and perpendicular to the long axis of the egg.
The circulation of the concentrated positive charges in the nucleus considered separately create a
magnetic field which is constant as long as the spin axis and spin speed remain constant. Combining the magnetic
fields by superposition in space causes the total magnetic field to decrease to practically zero a short distance
from the nucleus. However, there is a very intense magnetic field close to the nucleus. The orbiting pair of BSE
electrons must interact very strongly with that locally strong magnetic field, but only when they come near the
nucleus.
As the electron in orbit comes in close to the nucleus, the magnetic field of the electron and the magnetic
field of the nucleus must cause the electron to change its orbit and thus maintains it in a certain plane with
respect to the nuclear spin axis. Also the combination of the two moving magnetic fields and the accelerated
electron itself, can overlap in the neighborhood close the nucleus to create a temporary photon. That's the first
step to completion of the BSE electron pair.
If another electron happens be nearby, with all the proper conditions at the instant that the first electron is
transformed into a photon, the second electron can adopt a contrary orbit that exactly balances the first electron
180 degrees out of phase and with the opposite spin. This completes the BSE condensate around the ormus atom, and
so the tiny angel has its wings, you might imagine.
That is what it resembles. The solar disk with a pair of wings shaped like a figure eight. An angel is a proper
symbol because I believe we are talking about a tiny messenger of spiritual Light. It physically resembles the form
of a solar disk which was often used to represent angels. That can't be mere coincidence.
Because of the fact that the electrons are locked into a particular plane of orbit relative to the spin axis of
the nucleus, and thus to each other, they become moment arms by which electric fields can interact with the
nucleus, and thus may cause a change in the nuclear spin axis, in either a scalar or vector sense. The same thing
as a scalar wave translation mechanism to and from electric fields.
If the nuclear spin axis changes for any reason, for example by capture or loss of a neutron, this also effects
the orbital plane of the electrons, and they emit a photon as a result. This cancels out the change in the nuclear
spin axis so it comes to rest in a new orientation.
Now imagine a man suspending in zero-G hold a spinning bicycle wheel by it's axle. The spin axis of the spinning
wheel must remain fixed as long as there is no force applied to it. If he puts a force on the axis in such a way as
to attempt to change the axis of spin, when he removes that force, the wheel may have a new spin axis, but that new
spin axis remains fixed in space in a new position.
If he puts a gentle constant force on the wheel, then the spin axis will precess. That means it will rotate
slowly and constantly, like the spin axis of the earth does with a period of 25,200 years. There is a constant
force being applied to the earth: the galactic gravity field. If you attempt to spin a gyroscope on the surface of
the earth, it will precess, because the earth's gravity is a constant force that it must react to.
Any spinning mass whose axis precesses, will receive or transmit scalar waves. Scalar waves = mass angular
momentum. The precessing axis of the earth receives scalar waves from the gravitation of the galaxy (and the sun,
moon and planets), because the precession of the axis shows that there is a constant influx of angular momentum
from somewhere. Gravity is that constant influx of scalar waves. If the axis of a spinning body changes, then
something acted upon it to change the angular momentum. Constant angular momentum = constant spin axis both in the
vector and scalar sense. That's a fact.
No different with an ormus atom. The BSE electron 'wings' can interact with electric fields and photons,
including those of the neighboring ormus atoms to change the ormus nuclear spin axis. This requires the emission of
a scalar wave.
The converse is equally true. If any input of force changed angular momentum (even if caused by reception of a
scalar wave) then it changed the nuclear axis of spin (in a scalar or vector sense or both), this would result in
an instantaneous change in the BSE electron orbits, because they are locked into the plane of nuclear spin axis by
the strong magnetic field near the nucleus.
If a scalar wave is angular momentum, then the smallest known natural unit is the spin momentum of the
neutrino/2. Electrons can have integer multiples of 1/2 spin. The BSE electrons when they are orbiting the ormus
atom have +1/2 or -1/2 spin, and they always sum to zero spin, the same as a photon.
That is enough for one installment.
I ask that all of you who are reading this give me your good will and prayers to come up with a convenient means
for measuring ormus bulk spin state. I believe that by the time I have written all this series and answered your
questions, I will have received it.
May the Love, Light and the glory of God be upon you.
Larry
Date: Fri, 04 Jan 2002 19:04:47 -0500
From: Larry Schamber
email: Larry_Schamber@hotmail.com
Subject: Light on the matter of Ormus and Scalar waves
Dear Readers,
Today I was planning to put formulas and numbers together to prove analytically and quantitatively what I have
started regarding the unified theory of ormus matter and scalar waves. So I opened a physics book and began
researching and learned a few scientific things that I had guessed before.
I should correct an error and apologize. I was sometimes referring to BSE electrons, when I should have said BEC
electrons. BEC = Bose Einstein Condensate. BEC is how electron pairs can orbit a nucleus and have the same orbital
energy. Electrons are bosons, they are subject to the Pauli exclusion principle, which dictates that they have
different orbitals. When they undergo a change near the high spin nucleus a fermion is instantaneously formed. A
photon is an example of a fermion. Fermions are not subject to the Pauli exclusion principle, thus they can have
the same or different orbitals. However, they MUST have orbitals 180 degrees out of phase, so they don't collide,
therefore eventually they divide their energy until they have the same orbital, but as fermions not bosons. The
condensation from boson to fermion is a Bose Einstein Condensate.
Now I am reading Shpilman's theories with the real possibility that I might be able to understand them, and
indeed his thinking seems very similar to mine, and yes, his validates my insights. He even discusses ormus matter
(DS-matter he named it) and the scalar wave is renamed the axion wave. He says the scalar/axion beam is generated
from spinning matter under certain conditions, related to the Poynting vector. I say it's really a symmetric
relationship. The scalar/axion wave causes matter to spin; to cause a change in angular momentum.
Shpilman's website:
http://www.pmicro.kz/MISC/UFL/Almanach/AxionA.htm
The following page numbers are cites from the same physics book that I was using before: Fundamentals of
Physics, Halliday and Resnick, extended third edition, Wiley, 1974.
All interactions of scalar/EM waves upon matter cause either spin/torque or motion/force. The B field in a EM
wave causes an electron to spin in its orbit, and the same thing to the nucleus, any change to the nucleus angular
momentum is either through a vector change or scalar change of the axial momentum. Since the precession of the
angular momentum of the nucleus is the basic means of scalar/EM interaction/translation in matter, then it may be
understood how brain electro-chemistry and nuclear physics can be mediated by scalar waves in situations that were
previously enigmatic; spiritual transmissions, intuitions, clairvoyance and prayer.
If a spherical nucleus is made to spin fast, it deforms into an ellipsoid. For a simplified model imagine the
spinning nucleus is like a spring connecting two concentrated point masses, where each mass is total mass/2. Faster
spin translates into lengthening of the spring; equates to an input of energy. The spring is nuclear binding
energy, which is inside of the nucleus.
If the nuclear spin were to try to increase beyond some critical limit, then a neutron would materialize inside
the nucleus, because that's where the spin-energy of the binding force is located. This allows the angular momentum
to increase without letting the angular speed increase. The neutron could decay and be emitted instantly, or after
a much longer time. It doesn't fundamentally change a T-metal if it stays in the nucleus. Gold remains gold,
platinum remains platinum. Neutrino emissions are also harmless to human flesh.
Page 1030
The Stern Gerlach experiment showed that spin is space quantized. The angular spin of any nucleus must change in
fixed steps that are integer multiples of the Bohr magneton. Angular momentum and magnetic moment are inherently
linked, because of the fact any nuclei has protons (mass with positive charges) when they spin, they create a
strong magnetic field, which is quantized in whole steps equal to the Bohr magneton. An electron has an inherent
spin of +_0.5 Bohr magneton.
In the Stern Gerlach experiment silver was vaporized in an oven and the vapor was formed into a narrow stream by
allowing it to pass through a slit. The silver atoms were directed through an inhomogeneous magnetic field, which
made the atoms with various magnetic moments deflect by various amounts. The silver beam was deposited on a glass
slide where the deflection effects could be measured.
The result was that the beam split cleanly into two distinct streams, which showed that the spin was space
quantized. This means that spin can only exist in one axis at a time, and whatever position it happens to be in
when it flies through the magnetic field determines how it deflects.
My point is that spinning nuclei are exactly like gyroscopes: no matter how it got the spin, it must remain
fixed in one axis relative to the cosmos until a force is applied which tries to change the spin. I state further
that any forced precession of the nucleus will be compensated for by other mechanisms which will allow it to
instantly come to rest in a new position. If these means are efficient and fast the nucleus could return to its
previous alignment. The mechanisms would be the emission of a scalar wave from the nucleus, or the emission of a
photon or photons by the attached electrons. Another mechanism in a quantum coherent system would be the quantum
conduction of photon waves system wide. This would be the most fast and efficient means of restoring the axial spin
to the rest state.
Page 1024
The Einstein-deHaas experiment showed that nuclear magnetic moment is linked so that it is exactly the opposite
direction from the mass angular momentum. An iron cylinder was suspended inside of solenoid coil such that it could
easily rotate on a long fine wire. When a current caused an external magnetic field to be applied, this forced the
magnetic moments and thus also the mass angular moments to all align parallel to the magnetic field axis. The mass
angular momentum of the many nuclei was randomly oriented at first. When they aligned, the angular momentum must be
conserved, so there must be a compensating change in angular momentum, which would become readily apparent as the
spin of the bulk iron cylinder. It was confirmed with the experiment.
This proved the linkage between nuclear magnetic moment and nuclear mass angular momentum. Therefore we have a
means for high spin states and magnetic fields which change the angular mass momentum to cause a related turning of
the electron pair. This in turn causes photon emissions, as mentioned before.
page 1027
It's already shown that the angular momentum of a nucleus is quantized in both the scalar sense and the spatial
(vectoral) sense. That means it may change only in steps given as a multiple of a step size. Further, any change in
nuclear spin, which is imparted from a scalar wave, must be quantized. Therefore, there is a minimum energy scalar
wave interaction which will be able to affect the angular momentum, or else it will only affect the linear momentum
of the nucleus or not at all. Lets assume for the moment that scalar waves can have a continuously variable measure
of energy intensity. This is a reasonable to assume since scalar waves are often formed by accidental
superpositions of many EM waves. Therefore, if it is rare that the 'right kind' of superpositions happen in the
very small space occupied by any given nucleus at sufficiently high intensity to impart the quantum of energy
required to change the nuclear spin in a whole quantum step, then that explains why scalar waves pass thru matter
with so little interaction.
Yet even that weak interaction is responsible for the force of gravity. So I will next show how ormus matter is
able to loose some of its interaction with gravity.
The angular momentum of an nucleus is quantized. Therefore the Heisenberg uncertainty principle can be applied
to an angular magnetic moment form of energy equation.
Let:
delta L = uncertainty of the magnetic moment L
delta phi = uncertainty of the angle phi with respect to an arbitrary known axis
h = Plank's const. = 6.626*10^-34 Joule*second
Then:
delta L * delta phi = h Plank's const.
If L is forced onto a known axis perhaps by an external magnetic field then delta L = 0; then delta phi must be
practically infinitely great.
Likewise, if there where any means to fix delta phi and delta L then the violation of the uncertainty principle
would cause the nucleus to vanish completely.
Dave Hudson says this happened. Therefore there must be some mechanism that places an upper limit on L, which in
effect forces delta L = 0. I believe this mechanism is two possibilities:
(1) Transformation of input energy into a neutron, and then the instantaneous loss of that neutron.
(2) Rejection of the input energy (we already accept that this happens in most cases)
Case (1) could happen in those extremely rare events where the chance input of energy from the scalar waves is
intense enough where it should have caused an increase in angular moment. The net result of all these intense
interactions with the bulk matter results in the force of gravity. When this pathway for interaction is done away
with, then gravitational force in the one axis can be reduced or done away with.
Imagine the binding force between the particles within the nucleus as a sort of a spring, and the mass is like
concentrated points at the ends of the spring. When it spins faster, the spring stretches, and this is as when the
spherical nucleus deforms into an ellipsoid.
When you stretch a spring, the spring stores up energy. So what happens when any energy input attempts to
increase the spin of the nucleus? The spring is stretched more, and the spring energy is increased.
At some point when the spin reaches a critical limit, the amount of energy stored in the 'spring' of the binding
force is just less than the energy of a neutron, and when the next small increase in energy input exceeds that
equality then a neutron materializes inside the nucleus. This instantly decreases the speed of the spin, and the
angular momentum is able to stay below that critical limit.
This is the upper limit to L, the angular momentum. When the spin energy reaches just below the critical limit,
any increase in spin is not permitted, because a neutron is converted from binding energy, so that the angular
momentum decreases well below that critical limit.
Why is the neutron created? In order toy preserve Heisenberg's uncertainty. As I stated before, it is a law of
nature that the axis of spin is spatially fixed and quantized. The input energy must be integer multiples of the
Bohr magneton. The spin axis is fixed with respect to the cosmos, and any force that perturbs it will be met with
an equal and opposite reaction by the emission of the excess energy by scalar wave or photon emissions, so that
immediately the nucleus comes to rest in the new position, or perhaps the former position. I am still not sure.
Further, the faster that the nucleus spins, the stronger is the interaction with scalar waves, and the more
immovable is the compensation for axis changing inputs of momentum from scalar waves.
This all works for the reduced uncertainty of the angular position phi.
Next to consider is the small change of angular momentum compared to the mass and angular momentum of any heavy
and high spin state nucleus. This amounts to a very small delta L, and a larger input of momentum from scalar wave
interactions. Hence the crisis comes to a head and is resolved by the creation of matter: the neutron within the
nucleus.
But there is one rule here that is more important: if there is binding energy due to increased spin momentum
sufficient for a neutron to be formed, then IT MUST BE FORMED. This can occur at a different increase in spin
energy than that prohibited by the uncertainty principle. If there is a difference in energy to be disposed of,
where does the difference of energy come from or go to? If there is not enough energy in the incident scalar wave
to increase angular momentum in a quantum step, then the input energy is resisted, and the interaction is rejected.
If too much energy is provided, and the critical limit might be passed, then only that amount of energy is accepted
sufficient to just form a neutron and adopt a new lower quantum angular momentum, for the new higher mass.
But the lowest limit of uncertainty given by the Heisenberg uncertainty principle must be maintained, therefore
the new state must end up as uncertain as before, or perhaps more uncertain than the uncertainty limit.
Excess neutrons can be carried in the T-metal nuclei or emitted later, without chemical or nuclear change or
harm to human flesh. Incidental emissions of scalar waves or light waves will compensate for angular momentum
changes resulting from neutron emissions. If the person is charged up with a great deal of m-state in the high spin
state and with excess neutrons, it might all be discharged at once by a combination of quantum coherence and
neutron activated chain reaction. He would appear to shine with physical light. I am not sure if there would be
other subjective effects. This might happen after a great deal of intense high-energy coherent scalar wave
reception, i.e. spiritual light. I think this explains the transfiguration. Mat 17:1-3, Lk 9:28-32, Ex 34:29-35
Also weak light emissions have been observed normally emanating from people and living cells. Some of this is
ordinary photochemistry, but part of it might be the effect of m-state neutron decay, or electric field
interactions with m-state.
Then if the uncertainty of the spin axis is set to practically zero, this requires an increase in the
uncertainty of the spin angular momentum, reducing the critical limit so much lower. The spin axis can be increased
by physically spinning the whole sample, or by a strong external magnetic field or by both together. This further
reduces the critical limit for scalar wave interactions, and thus weakens the apparent effect of gravity and light
waves (or any EM waves). This explains the invisibility and nullification of weight of ormus matter in Hudson's
investigations.
The reverse can be accomplished, so that the scalar flux is more strongly absorbed by the material. When this is
done, the material will appear to shield gravity. This explains the Finnish experiments lately which use a spinning
superconductive disk and an induced magnetic field vector rotating parallel to the horizontal plane. Hence all
vertical scalar interactions are favored, while those perpendicular to the force of gravity are prohibited.
If UFOs are using some form of these principles for engineering anti-gravitation for the whole vehicle, that
would explain why they sometimes vanish or seem to pop into sight from nowhere.
Love, Light and the glory of God be upon you.
Larry
Date: Sun, 06 Jan 2002 05:59:11 -0000
From: Larry Schamber
Subject: Fwd: Re: Light on the matter of Ormus and Scalar waves
Barry Carter <bcarter@i...> wrote:
>Dear Larry,
>
>I really like what you have written about scalar waves and how they
>might relate to ORMUS and ORMUS effects like levitation and quantum
>coherence.
Thanks Barry. I am really glad somebody has read it and concurs with me. Plus, as I review all the technical
background on ormus my theory looks more valid. I see lots of confirmations there, and with Shpilman and
others.
However, I cannot discern an underlying physical mechanism for megalithic structures, even if they contained
higher concentrations of ormus. It could be assumed that scalar waves are generated in underground rivers or magma
flow or perhaps a high concentration of ferromagnetic and paramagnetic matter (including ormus), which have either
decreased or increased the surface magnetic field above 1 gauss, so that may create an unusual sensation.
I have been feeling extra vertigo and dizziness in the last 24 hours. I mean I feel like a drunk, and I have to
be careful not to fall over when I am walking. This correlates with recent solar weather which has increased the
ground magnetic field, so it would depress the normal ability of ormes in the body to respond to the natural scalar
wave flux which is needed for some people to both think and feel normally. Any magnetic shielding to prevent this
would make me feel much better. Perhaps this is some unexpected effect of the 250 ml of Mountain Manna Au/Ir which
I consumed recently in only seven days.
>I suspect that the ancients used stone technology to
>resonate and propagate scalar waves. Following is some information
>which you might think about how it relates to this.
I can't understand how the pyramids or megaliths work, yet. Maybe it'll come to me, the same way the other
knowledge has come to me.
I studied much of the content referenced by the links. I see how a dowsing rod works to detect a scalar/axion
field, because it is a rod which freely pivots. In a constant scalar field it would receive a torque, so it would
turn.
However, a dowsing rod would respond the same way to an electric field gradient, so creating confusion in some
situations for the Czech investigator.
A special dowsing rod could be constructed which could be shielded from E and H fields within a steel box. It
would respond only to gravity and constant scalar fields. Transient scalar fields could not be detected this
way.
It is a big problem anyway to detect scalar waves. I have to think further about this. I have no clear idea yet
for some kind of high tech dowsing rod.
<minutes later...>
I just had an idea for detecting scalar waves. Ormus matter should be paramagnetic, which means that when it is
placed in a magnetic field it's nuclei (which are spinning) have an axis of spin that can be forced to align with
an externally imposed magnetic field. This paramagnetic effect should vary depending on the bulk spin. So the
higher the bulk spin, the higher the paramagnetism. A second coil or other device would measure the induced
magnetic field. A gauss meter could work, but a coil also.
Paramagnetism is a complicated effect. But it looks like this is a means for:
(1) scalar wave detector
(2) scalar wave transmission and
(3) ormus bulk spin rate measurement.
There are other paramagnetic materials; bismuth and aluminum, water and some others.
Let's focus on (3) ormus bulk spin rate measurement. Water is also paramagnetic. This adds a confusing variable.
If the ormus has a mixture of spins, then the axes individually will align at different intensities of the external
magnetic field. I would expect them all to align well before reaching 1000 gauss = 0.1000 Tesla. Hg loses its
superconductivity at 0.04 T = 400 gauss. I remember reading somewhere on Barry's site that ormus loses
superconductivity at 100 gauss. This field could be easily generated with an air core solenoid or a permanent
magnet.
So this is how it would work. Assume that a container can be built which is thick walled and tightly sealed so
any tunneling or superfluid escape can be avoided. Possibly, the water solution could be frozen solid as part of
this strategy, which would also eliminate the paramagnetic effect of the water. Second, we engineer a slow increase
in magnetic field only high enough to flip over and align all the nuclei, and no higher.
A more intense magnetic field would constrain the spin axis to an even tighter alignment. I think the high spin
rate combined with an intense magnetic field causes the onset of ormus matter becoming invisible (really a crisis
of quantum uncertainty regarding state) and reappearing where the magnetic field is not so strong, and so the
quantum uncertainty is increased to a permissible degree. This might be an interesting phenomenon to demonstrate in
a lab, but it would tend to make the paramagnetic properties difficult to measure.
There would be a cylindrical coil with an air coil. A secondary coil wrapped on the same axis would measure the
B field. Just to insure that the field is relatively uniform, the coil should be much longer, perhaps three
times longer than the length of the cylindrical volume holding the sample. Then the imposed field would be cycled
in a controlled fashion, and the B coil would sense and permit a record of the paramagnetic properties of the
sample.
The response of the sample would follow this formula:
B = H * munot * mur
such that:
B = secondary measured field [Tesla]
H = induced field [Tesla]
munot = 4*pi*10-7 H/m = magnetic permeability of air/vacuum
mur = relative permeability of sample
If the magnetic field is uniform, and the entire sample was in the same spin high spin state, and the same spin
axis at the start then they would all flip and align at the exact same point in the increase of the induced field.
However, there must be some variation of field, spin state (scalar sense) and spin axis (vector sense), so they
will align in stages as the field reaches the saturation point, where all the spin axes must align.
These spin flips will register as a multitude of tiny blips in the B field, which will make the curve depart
from a 1/1:B/H slope. This is the response which is the measurable factor. However, it may require great technical
precision and analysis to extract the total paramagnetic measurement from the data record. This explains (3)ormus
bulk spin rate measurement.
Now let's consider: (1) scalar wave measurement. After all the spin axes have all been aligned with the induced
magnetic field, if the sample is inside a Faraday cage, and one with considerable magnetic field shielding also, if
the imposed field is kept steady but even so if there is any change in the spin state of the paramagnetic material
(assuming it is free either to increase or decrease, not influenced by quantum uncertainty crisis or neutron decay)
then this must have been caused by a scalar wave that penetrated the Faraday cage and induced the changed nuclear
spin.
A slightly simpler device might be desired than the ormus spin meter described above. One could place a disk of
bismuth between two other disks of a ceramic permag (ferromagnetic) material, so that there is a steady external
field on the bismuth. This is not a problem as the max field to get 100% paramagnetic alignment is more than 5
Tesla which has never been achieved with permanent magnet materials. Also this device would be partially
directional; the spin axes that were aligned with the magnetic field are subject to changes in spin parallel only
to the same axis. Therefore, the axis that is spin aligned would be subject to detection of any change in the
nuclear spin rate, which would appear very clearly as a jump in the voltage on the B coil.
One must be careful to assure that the coil is not just detecting EM fields from surrounding space, thus the
need for significant Faraday and magnetic shielding. This shielding would also act as a filter for scalar waves of
a particular wavelength which are unable to pass through the shielding before they separate into EM components. It
might be possible to open up a hole through the shielding to permit directional aiming of the entire apparatus
similar to a pinhole camera, except this would respond to short wavelength scalar waves. This explains the (1)
scalar wave detector.
Next consider a (2) scalar wave transmitter. If the magnetic field is periodically reversed, the nuclear spin
axis of the paramagnetic material will reverse at the same frequency. This should create a scalar wave that would
be able to pass through the shielding and be registered by the previously described detector. This explains the (2)
scalar wave transmission. Actually, you don't need the permanent magnet for the transmitter. The air coil alone
will do it.
Bismuth should be a good, cheap material for these devices. But there would be certain advantages to using pure
dry compressed or sintered ormus matter in a high spin state: for the same induced field strength you would get a
more powerful transmission, since 100% of the spin axes of the matter would be shifting directions at a much lower
field intensity, 100 gauss compared to 50,000 gauss. Also the ormus matter would likewise be a much more sensitive
receiver medium.
Plus one must consider what happens to the spin state when an external magnetic field is imposed upon it. If the
field is strong enough, and the spin state is high enough, one would approach the quantum uncertainty crisis. If
that happened, you would be able to transmit waves of quantum uncertainty, at necessarily unknown delta E * delta
T. Because in the previous explanation I showed how this crisis of quantum uncertainty made it necessary for the
ormus matter to take drastic action to avoid being pinched into a state of angular momentum and angular alignment
that was more determinate than permitted by equation to Plank's constant.
One way to avoid this certainty crisis is to re-emit some of the spin energy as a scalar wave, thus reducing the
alignment and magnetic intensity of the axis field with the external field. Yet, if one could detect and sum the
emitted scalar wave with the parameters of the material as it approached the certainty crisis, it would reconstruct
the certainty again. Therefore, the quantum uncertainty must also be allowed to escape with the scalar wave so that
the parameters of the scalar wave are:
delta E * delta t = h ;Heisenberg's Uncertainty principle
such that:
h = Plank's constant
delta E = the uncertainty energy of the scalar wave
delta t = the uncertainty of time of the wave to travel a known
distance
The product on the left must be greater, and not less than h, Plank's constant. If we know what should be the
emitted energy of the wave, in order to avoid violating the principle of uncertainty, the wave must be able to
travel with a speed given by
Letting:
delta v = x / delta t ;delta t can be plus or minus
s = c+delta v ;superlight speed
So the scalar wave can travel faster than the speed of light under certain conditions of the transmitter. That
explains superlight.
Love, Light and the glory of God be upon you.
Larry Schamber
|